AI-native software consultancy
We are not the firm that takes over your programme. We are the two or three people inside it who make the expensive calls correctly, ship alongside your engineers, and leave your team able to keep going without us.
Headcount stopped being the measure of what a software team can deliver. Judgement and standards did not.
Capabilities
01
We take the senior seat on the calls that are expensive to get wrong — feasibility, architecture, sequencing — and give you an answer you can act on rather than a deck.
02
We embed. Your programme, your backlog, your standards — with senior people in it who have done the hard version before, and who are accountable for shipped work rather than advice.
03
The goal is that your engineers do this without us. We run the workshops, set the standards, and put the evaluation practice in place that makes AI-assisted delivery measurable instead of anecdotal.
04
We design agent systems that do real work: separated planning, implementation and review roles, wired into the systems a business already runs. Discovery moves in days.
05
The leverage is usually in the tool nobody has built yet — migration tooling, evaluation platforms, and internal assistants wired into systems a company already pays for.
How we work
01
Before a roadmap: the code, the pipelines, the tickets, the delivery reality. Due diligence discipline applied to your own systems, so the plan is grounded in what is actually there.
02
Agentic discovery against the real domain, not a sandbox. A PoC that touches your data and your constraints, fast enough that being wrong is cheap.
03
Evaluation before scale. Agent output gets measured, reviewed by an independent role, and held to a standard — because the failure mode of AI delivery is confident output nobody checked.
04
To production, with your team able to run it. Standards, tooling and enablement stay behind. A small agency that becomes load-bearing is a risk to its client, and we would rather be re-hired than depended on.
Stack
Chosen per engagement, not per fashion, and usually inherited from the client rather than imposed. This is what recurs.
The gap we close
Teams get further than ever before hitting the same wall: the prototype works, and nobody can safely change it. No tests, no boundaries, secrets sitting in the client, dependencies nobody chose — and an agent that will cheerfully make all of it worse at speed. That is the moment we are useful.
Secrets out of the client, authentication and authorisation that actually hold, input validated at the boundary, and a dependency tree somebody has looked at.
Real module boundaries, typed contracts, dead paths deleted. The difference between a codebase a team can extend and one they are afraid of.
Coverage on the paths that lose money or data, written failing first so the test is proven to work. Not a percentage on a dashboard.
Environments, migrations, observability, a rollback that has been rehearsed, and a bill you can predict.
Agent standards, review gates and evaluations, so the next feature built at speed does not quietly undo this work.
We do not throw the codebase away and start again. The fastest path to production is almost always the code you already have, made safe to change.
Get it shippedWhere we work
We work with companies in the European Union, North America (United States and Canada) and the Middle East. Remote by default, on the client’s working hours, with overlap into every one of those time zones from Sarajevo.
Full working-day overlap from Central European Time
Morning-to-afternoon overlap across Eastern and Central
Near-complete working-day overlap with the Gulf
Open work
Alongside client work we run a small portfolio of web tools and give them away — no account, no upload, no cost. It is where we hold ourselves to the delivery standards we sell: in public, against real users, with nothing hidden behind a demo.
See them on GitHubContact
Due diligence on a target, an AI programme that has stalled at PoC, a modernization your team is carrying without senior cover — those are the conversations we are useful in. We are a small team, so we say no to work we would do badly. Write to us and we will tell you plainly which this is.
